Consltek Blog

Organizations today face an unprecedented challenge in modernizing their network security infrastructure. The Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) represents more than a technological upgrade—it’s a fundamental reimagining of how businesses approach network connectivity and security.  Transitioning to a Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) architecture is transformative for businesses aiming to modernize their IT infrastructure. It enables organizations to merge network and security functionalities into a unified, cloud-native solution. However, many companies grapple with understanding the logistics of transitioning, the deployment timeline, and how SASE integrates with existing systems.   This guide will break down the SASE deployment process into digestible steps, provide estimates for deployment timelines, and explore compatibility with legacy network configurations, ensuring that your organization can embrace SASE confidently.  What is SASE and Why It Matters?  At its core, SASE combines network security functions like Secure Web Gateway (SWG), Firewall-as-a-Service (FWaaS), and Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) with Wide Area Networking (WAN) capabilities such as Software-Defined WAN (SD-WAN). This merger optimizes performance, security, and agility for today’s dispersed workforce and hybrid environments.  Key SASE Benefits:  Enhanced scalability and security in cloud-based applications.  Streamlined management with a single-pane-of-glass control.  Cost efficiency by reducing hardware dependence.  Performance & Optimization Metrics  Expected Outcomes  Metric  Pre-SASE  Post-SASE  Improvement  Security Incident Response Time  4-6 Hours  30-45 Minutes  85% Reduction  Network Operational Costs  High  Optimized  40-60% Reduction  User Access Provisioning  Manual  Automated  75% Efficiency Gain        How Long Will SASE Deployment Take? – The Deployment Landscape: Key Considerations  Successful SASE implementation is not a simple technology swap but a strategic organizational transformation involving multiple critical dimensions:  Technological Readiness  Organizational Alignment  Architectural Complexity  Operational Continuity  Deployment Timelines by Organization Size  Organization Type  Deployment Timeframe  Considerations  Small Business  1–3 months  Minimal legacy infrastructure; faster deployment.  Mid-Sized Enterprise  3–6 months  Moderate legacy integration and user onboarding.  Large Enterprise  6–12 months  Complex legacy systems and global workforce.    The timeline depends on factors like:  Network complexity (e.g., legacy systems).  Geographical spread of the workforce.  Vendor capabilities and chosen SASE components.  Critical Milestones  Pre-Migration Assessment: 2–4 weeks.  Proof of Concept (PoC): 4–6 weeks.  Full Rollout: 2–9 months depending on scale.  Phase 1: Preparatory Assessment & Planning / Organizational Readiness Evaluation (4-6 Weeks)  Conduct a thorough evaluation of your existing setup.  Current Infrastructure Audit   Inventory Management: Document network components like firewalls, VPNs, and MPLS.  Performance Benchmarks: Assess current latency, throughput, and security efficacy.  Identify Gaps: Highlight areas where your current architecture falls short.  A readiness assessment should answer questions like:  Is your current WAN architecture capable of integrating SD-WAN?  What workloads and data flows are cloud-native versus on-premises?  Stakeholder Alignment   Executive leadership buy-in  Cross-functional team formation  Initial budget and resource allocation  Technical Preliminary Assessment / Architectural Compatibility Analysis   Legacy system integration potential  Cloud service provider compatibility  Network performance baseline establishment  Choose the Right SASE Vendor  Not all vendors provide the same level of integration or service. Opt for a provider that matches your organization’s scale, security requirements, and cloud strategy.  Evaluation Criteria:  Criteria  Key Questions  Cloud Architecture  Does the vendor offer a fully cloud-native solution?  Scalability  Can the platform handle future workforce growth?  Features  Are Zero Trust, SWG, and SD-WAN robustly integrated?  Support  Does the vendor provide 24/7 global support?    Phase 2: Design and Solution Architecture (6-8 weeks)  SASE is policy-driven. Define your organization’s specific needs to shape security protocols and access rules.  Define Policies and Goals   Access Policies: Map users and devices to applications via Zero Trust principles.  Data Protection Policies: Integrate Data Loss Prevention (DLP) for sensitive data security.  Compliance Standards: Ensure configurations align with GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI DSS.  Solution Design Considerations  Identity and Access Management Integration  Cloud Service Provider Selection  Security Policy Framework Development  Network Performance Optimization Strategy  Key Design Deliverables  Detailed implementation blueprint  Proof of concept (PoC) architecture  Risk mitigation strategy  Performance benchmarking methodology  Here are some common challenges your team might face and their solution  Challenges  Solution  Integration with Legacy Systems  Use gateways or cloud connectors for seamless interoperability.  Policy Complexity  Leverage machine learning in SASE platforms to simplify policy management.  User Adoption  Conduct training sessions and provide real-time support.  Organizational Resistance  Continuous stakeholder communication with demonstrable performance benefits  Skill Gap  Get certification support for targeted training programs or use external expertise engagement    Phase 3: Pilot Implementation (8-12 Weeks)  Staged Rollout Strategy  A PoC ensures the proposed solution integrates seamlessly without disrupting business operations.  Conduct a Proof of Concept (PoC) – Key Activities:  Deploy SASE for a specific branch or user group.  Monitor performance, connectivity, and policy enforcement.  Gather feedback from stakeholders on user experience and security efficacy.  Initial Pilot Group Selection   Low-risk business units  Controlled test environment  Minimal operational disruption  Incremental Deployment Approach   Limited geographical scope  Specific application subset  Controlled user population  Performance Monitoring Framework  Real-time performance metrics  Continuous security validation  User experience tracking  Anomaly detection mechanisms  Phase 4: Full-Scale Enterprise Deployment (12-16 Weeks)  Migrate gradually and avoid a big-bang approach by rolling out SASE in phases:  Phased Geographic Expansion: Begin with remote access for a hybrid workforce.  Gradual User Base Expansion: Transition main offices and data centers.  Systematic Application Migration: Migrate branch offices and IoT devices.  Compatibility with Legacy Systems:  Use APIs or middleware for seamless data and policy migration.  Transition MPLS to SD-WAN incrementally, retaining critical on-premises setups as needed.  Critical Implementation Considerations  Minimal Operational Disruption  Continuous User Training  Real-Time Performance Optimization  Adaptive Security Configurations  Phase 5: Optimization and Continuous Improvement (Ongoing)  Deployment doesn’t end with integration; continuous monitoring and optimization are crucial.  Monitor and Optimize  Performance Metrics: Latency, packet loss, and application performance.  Security Posture: Real-time threat detection and response efficiency.  User Feedback: Ensure seamless experience across all endpoints.  Post-Deployment Enhancement Strategies  Advanced Threat Detection  Performance Tuning  Security Policy Refinement  Technological Adaptation  Adopting SASE is not just a technical upgrade; it’s a cultural shift toward network and security unification. With a structured approach—from assessing existing infrastructure to conducting PoCs and gradual rollouts—you can ensure a smooth transition.  Companies embracing SASE gain agility, security, and cost efficiency. Whether you’re a small business or a global enterprise, the

Explore how SASE outshines traditional networking with its cloud-native, unified security approach. Discover key differences, benefits, and why it’s the future!

Explore the core components of SASE—CASB, FWaaS, SD-WAN, SWG, and ZTNA—and discover how this cloud-native framework revolutionizes network security for modern, mobile-first organizations.

Discover how Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) is transforming network security for hybrid workforces, enhancing data protection, connectivity, and agility for remote and in-office teams alike. Explore key benefits and insights in this essential guide.

Guide to SASE Vendors 2024  In an era where digital transformation is driving businesses to adopt more cloud-based applications, Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) has emerged as a critical technology framework. It combines networking and security into a unified, cloud-delivered service. SASE solves challenges such as securing remote workforces, managing data protection in cloud environments, and ensuring optimized network performance across multiple locations.  While the adoption of SASE by enterprises is well-documented, mid-sized businesses—often grappling with limited IT budgets and a lack of internal expertise—are increasingly finding value in this model. This guide aims to help mid-sized organizations across industries select the right SASE vendor for their specific needs, balancing security, cost-efficiency, and network performance.  As you navigate the SASE vendor landscape, it’s important to understand that each category of vendor offers unique benefits and trade-offs. This guide categorizes vendors into four distinct groups—traditional appliance-based vendors, cloud-native security vendors, ground-up SASE vendors, and hybrid SASE vendors—and explores which might be the best fit for mid-sized businesses.  Traditional Appliance-Based Vendors   Overview  Traditional appliance-based vendors, such as Cisco, Fortinet, and Palo Alto Networks, have long dominated the networking space. As SASE continues to evolve, these vendors are transforming their hardware-driven solutions into more integrated, cloud-compatible services. They achieve this by incorporating features like SD-WAN, cloud security, and advanced threat detection.  Technology & Architecture  Appliance-based vendors typically operate by adapting their existing infrastructure to meet the demands of the SASE framework. For example, Cisco’s SD-WAN platform integrates Umbrella security services, offering an efficient hybrid model for businesses already heavily invested in Cisco’s network infrastructure.  From a technical standpoint, traditional appliance-based SASE solutions usually involve a combination of on-premise hardware, such as firewalls and routers, with cloud-managed services. This hybrid model appeals to businesses that still maintain on-premise data centers but want to extend security to their cloud infrastructure.  Case Study: Financial Services Firm  A mid-sized financial services firm, with a long history of using Cisco’s network infrastructure, began shifting to the cloud to accommodate remote workforces and SaaS applications. However, the company faced security risks, especially around the use of VPNs for remote access. By deploying Cisco’s Umbrella security suite integrated with SD-WAN, the firm not only extended secure access to all cloud apps but also achieved greater visibility over their network traffic.  Advantages  Seamless integration with existing networks: If your business already uses solutions from Cisco or Fortinet, adding SASE functionality can be more seamless and require fewer drastic changes.  Legacy networking expertise: Vendors like Palo Alto and Fortinet have decades of experience in network management, providing reliable and tested solutions for organizations with robust networking needs.  Comprehensive security suites: Traditional appliance vendors have extensive security capabilities, from Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFW) to Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS), that have been expanded into SASE offerings.  Challenges  High cost: Implementing traditional appliance-based solutions can be expensive, particularly when considering hardware maintenance and licensing fees.  Complex management: For businesses looking for simplicity, managing a hybrid of on-premise and cloud services might require a dedicated IT team.  Delayed agility: Traditional vendors may struggle to provide the same level of agility in updates, compared to cloud-native competitors.    Cloud-Native Security Vendors  Overview  Cloud-native vendors like Zscaler and Netskope were born in the cloud and designed to provide security as a service (SaaS). Their solutions are entirely cloud-delivered, offering scalability, flexibility, and ease of deployment for businesses of all sizes. These vendors focus on the security aspects of SASE, offering a broad array of services like secure web gateways (SWG), cloud access security brokers (CASB), and Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA).  Technology & Architecture  Cloud-native vendors operate without any dependency on hardware. Their platforms deliver secure connections directly through the cloud, leveraging global points of presence (PoPs) for optimized traffic routing and security. Zscaler, for instance, operates a globally distributed platform that ensures low-latency access to SaaS applications, providing enhanced performance and security for remote workers.  ZTNA, which replaces the need for traditional VPNs, allows businesses to enforce identity-based access controls, ensuring users only access the applications they are authorized for. The cloud-native approach to SASE also means that businesses can scale up or down rapidly, which is especially useful for growing mid-sized businesses.    Case Study: E-Commerce Business  A growing e-commerce company with offices spread across multiple countries found its existing VPN solution was inefficient and slow, hampering remote employee productivity. By adopting Zscaler’s ZTNA solution, the company eliminated the need for legacy VPNs and established direct, secure access to cloud-hosted applications. This resulted in a 30% increase in productivity and significant cost savings on network infrastructure.  Advantages  Faster deployment: Cloud-native vendors can deploy solutions quickly without the need for hardware, making them ideal for fast-growing businesses.  Cost-effective: Businesses save on capital expenditure since there is no need for physical hardware; you pay only for the services you use.  Global scalability: Cloud-native platforms offer a global network of PoPs that ensure low-latency, high-performance connectivity for users regardless of location.  Challenges  Vendor lock-in: Once an organization adopts a cloud-native vendor’s ecosystem, it can be challenging to switch due to the integration of various services.  Limited networking expertise: Cloud-native vendors may lack the depth of networking expertise compared to appliance-based vendors, focusing more on security aspects.    Ground-Up SASE Vendors  Overview  Ground-up SASE vendors like Cato Networks have designed their entire platform from scratch with the SASE framework in mind. This category represents the most holistic approach to SASE, where both networking and security are integrated into a single, cloud-native platform. These vendors have no legacy networking or security infrastructure to integrate, allowing them to build a fully cohesive service.  Technology & Architecture  Ground-up vendors have a distinct advantage over traditional and cloud-native vendors because they offer a tightly integrated solution that combines SD-WAN, ZTNA, FWaaS (Firewall-as-a-Service), and cloud access security in a unified platform. Cato Networks, for example, delivers all network security and optimization services from its global private backbone, bypassing the public internet for more reliable, low-latency connections.  With this approach, businesses do not need to juggle

Ever taken a cheap auto insurance and got a really bad service when you got into an accident? The value of a good insurance company will only be reflected when you have to file a claim. Until then, it will look like money down the drain. Your back up is somewhat like that. As long as you are not required to do a recovery, your cheapest back up service will look as good as the most expensive one. The real deal is when you have to recover something important, especially situations like ransomware. Here is a real customer horror story. Customer was a prime target for ransomware because the employees are mostly non-technical who will easily click on any phishing e-mail. Customer already was target of spear phishing and had lost money in the past. Customer was proposed a backup solution that included on-premises as well as cloud backup.  But a cost driven decision drove the customer to opt for a cloud only backup solution. One bad morning customer got hit with ransomware. Bad players encrypted 4 TB of shared folder which was critical for customer operation. Not a single employee could function without the file share. We had multiple good backups to download from. However, the time it took to download 4 TB of data was outrageous. The download speed of the back provider was so slow that it took 32 hours to download 4TB. To make things worse,  download failed during first attempt after 26 hours and was required to download again taking another 32 hours. All this was done while negotiating with the bad folks, parallelly trying to decrypt the files and isolating all other devices in the network. Finally, all the systems were restored, and business was back to normal. But in the process, customer lost 2 full weeks of productivity, between isolating, triaging, recovering, validating and bring everything back online. With 110 employees, two weeks of lost productivity turned out to be more than $200,000 in cost to the customer in addition to $22,000 to recovery services. Backup is like your insurance policy. Make sure you get one that covers you when you are really in need of it.

Let’s dive into how penetration testing plays a vital role in beefing up security in hospitals.

These vital institutions now face an onslaught of digital dangers, from ransomware to data breaches